Some elders in our group want a cooperative society because that is what they know. Younger members say a Producer Company is better. Which one should we actually choose and why?
3 Answers
For a new FPO, a Producer Company under the Companies Act is usually the better choice today, and it is also what the 10,000 FPO scheme is built around. Reasons: it keeps the one member one vote spirit of a cooperative but runs with the professional discipline of a company (board, audit, ROC filing), it faces less day to day interference from the state cooperative department, members get limited liability, and it is easier to raise institutional credit and grants. A cooperative society is governed by the state cooperative act, which varies by state and often brings more government control and slower decisions. The main trade off is that a Producer Company has stricter annual compliance (audited accounts, ROC returns) so you need someone to keep the books clean. If your group can manage that discipline, go with the Producer Company. Check the latest scheme eligibility on the SFAC/NABARD portal before deciding.
We chose Producer Company. Far less babu interference than the old cooperative our fathers ran. Worth it.
True about compliance though. Keep a part time accountant from day one or the ROC penalties will eat you.